children looking through hole in barrier
End the Occupation

Criticizing the occupation and Israeli policies towards the Palestinians

Combat Unfair Attacks

Addressing unfair and inaccurate attacks from the far left

Two State Solution

Seeking a fair and just final status two-state solution to the Middle East conflict

Free Newsletter
Free Newsletter

Spotlights

Bard Protest Was Not Antisemitic

By Kenneth SternThe following is my response to Batya Ungar-Sargon’s original article in The Forward; my piece ...

Jewish Bund’s Anti-Zionism Idealized & Idolized

By Ralph SeligerOn the evening of Sept. 16, New York’s YIVO Institute sponsored a ...

Is Netanyahu, Stalwart of Int’l Right, Toast?

By TTNWith a virtual tie between Likud and Blue-White, an interesting question is whether ...

Trump’s ‘Disloyal’ Charge Traced to Neocon Origins

By TTN BlogOur TTN colleague, CUNY prof and Nation columnist Eric Alterman, draws a ...

Ex-CIA Agent, Candidate for Congress, Antisemite?

By Rebecca LessesValerie Plame is running for Congress (in the Democratic primary) for the ...

Blaming Israel/Jews for 9/11 and Iraq

By Ralph SeligerThe following revisits debates from recent decades that still weigh upon American ...

Is Anti-Israel Left Antisemitic?

By Ralph SeligerAs explained in my post this past February on NY Times opinion editor ...

Boycott If You Wish, But Don’t Force Others

By TTNIn addition to “Don’t Be ‘Useful Idiots’ for BDS” by Michael Walzer, ...

Don’t Be ‘Useful Idiots’ for BDS

By Michael WalzerThis is a followup to “Summer of Defeats for Academic BDS.” This short ...

Summer of Defeats for Academic BDS

By TTN BlogAt the beginning of August, the executive committee of The Third Narrative’s ...

Top Israeli Security Vets Support 2 States

By TTNThe following letter, dated August 27, 2019, was co-signed by 25 retired ...

What Anti-Zionist Leftists Get Wrong

By Bernard BohbotLoathing Israel has become a religion in a large segment of the ...

The Third Narrative Blog

US Dept. of Ed. Threatens Academic Freedom at Duke-UNC

By Alliance for Academic Freedom

AAF Expresses Concern Regarding U.S. Department of Education Letter to Duke-UNC Consortium for Middle East Studies

The Alliance for Academic Freedom remains concerned about the chilling effect on academic freedom of the letter that the U.S. Department of Education sent to the Duke-University of North Carolina Consortium for Middle East Studies on August 29 and about the nature of the Consortium’s programming.* Although the Department of Education renewed funding for the program on September 30 for 2019-2020, its letter alleged that the Consortium had violated Title VI of the Higher Education Act and implied that the Department intended to micromanage future Title VI activity, without the advice of experts in international and area studies.

News reports describing the March 2019 program hosted by Duke-UNC’s Consortium reflect the complicated nature of this case. There were credible, if disputed, allegations of an overtly antisemitic performance at the conference,** which university leadership acknowledged and condemned. Antisemitism, like any form of bigotry, should be denounced wherever it occurs, including on a campus. But as a general principle we do not believe funding for an entire program should be scuttled because of a single event or speaker.

Furthermore, the Department’s reservations about the Consortium’s impact on K-12 education are both unclear and undocumented. Thus, it is difficult to judge whether its programming fulfills the goals of Title VI to provide funds for the development of high-quality language and area studies or if, as the Department’s August 29th letter states, the Consortium’s teacher-training activities instead “advance narrow, particularized views of American social issues.” We are particularly concerned about such programming because we recognize that K-12 teachers are not protected by the same type of academic freedom as applies to those in higher education.

Title VI provides funds for a particular purpose. Federal government has the right, indeed the obligation, to make sure those funds are spent appropriately. Both the Department and the Duke-UNC Consortium have an obligation to ensure that scholarly undertakings on subjects such as the Middle East live up to Title VI’s goal. Yet there is a danger to academic freedom whenever the government seeks to substitute its analysis of what is being taught for that of professors and experts in the field. Academics leading Title VI programs deserve a presumption that their programs are academically appropriate. This is particularly true when the complaint is that the teaching lacks “balance,” which is a matter better left to the academy to determine, rather than Department of Education officials.

By renewing the Consortium’s funds, the Department has preserved academic freedom at the Consortium. But we remain concerned about the chilling effect of this exchange, and also wary about the nature of the Consortium’s programming and its impact on K-12 teachers.

*See NY Times news story.

**View YouTube video of controversial performance, deemed by some as antisemitic and others as satire.  UNC’s interim chancellor condemned this performance for (in his view) containing “disturbing and hateful language.”  And UNC has invited our TTN colleague, Kenneth Stern, to lecture on antisemitism.